Evaluating geographical enquiries
I can evaluate the effectiveness of the different stages of a geographical enquiry.
Evaluating geographical enquiries
I can evaluate the effectiveness of the different stages of a geographical enquiry.
These resources will be removed by end of Summer Term 2025.
Lesson details
Key learning points
- There are many stages of a geographical enquiry that can be evaluated.
- Conclusions should be evaluated to show how reliable and valid the data is.
- Geographical research is often evaluated to see how ethically and morally considerate it is.
Keywords
Objective - objective data is data that is considered to be factual
Subjective - subjective data is data that is based on opinions
Reliable - reliable data is data that would show the same result were it to be collected on a comparably similar occasion
Valid - valid data is data that allows the geographer to answer their enquiry question successfully
Anomaly - a piece of data that sits outside the general trend and cannot be explained
Common misconception
Highlighting the flaws in a geographical enquiry shows that I am a poor geographer.
Good geographers take time to be deeply reflective of their work and will present their findings honestly and transparently, even if they show errors that affect the final outcome. Good geographers also show how a study can be improved and extended.